Spanking Your Wife? Without their consent? And MGTOW? – Rant

7

March 11, 2015 by jayce428

A blogger posted saying that:

Matt Forney had a great article about this called “Saving Women from Themselves“: though he didn’t address marital discipline, the point still stands. Telling or showing someone that they’re on a self-destructive path is an act of mercy and love, even if you end up hurting them in the short-term.

http://mattforney.com/hurt-wife-show-love/

So the blogger then decides this is why her husband is spanking her, and that’s OK because she’s just as a child is – this isn’t a D/s relationship because it’s not consensual and she believes she’s a piece of shit. She can’t be independent and if she does something that doesn’t please her husband it’s OK for him to punish her. There is a fine line between BDSM and abuse, and this is a man who thinks he has to punish his wife to ‘save her from herself’.

Now making the transition to the MGTOW subject – if you’ve been living under a rock there has been a new movement called “men go their own way”, basically a group believing that it’s their way or the high way.

M.G.T.O.W – Men Going Their Own Way is a statement of self-ownership, where the modern man preserves and protects his own sovereignty above all else. It is the manifestation of one word: “No”. Ejecting silly preconceptions and cultural definitions of what a “man” is. Looking to no one else for social cues. Refusing to bow, serve and kneel for the opportunity to be treated like a disposable utility. And, living according to his own best interests in a world which would rather he didn’t.

http://www.mgtow.com/about/

My biggest question about this statement is: what do you mean ‘living according to his own best interest’ mean? Would you rather be allowed to go out and touch women without your consent? Fine go out and find out what happens. It seems these are the men wanting to be allowed to sit down, and watch the game without their wives being mad that they have to do all the housework.

Under the FAQ section someone asked: “What does a MGTOW think about marriage?”

Why have a wife… when he can have a LIFE?

Marriage is for gays.

Really? It’s just amazing what people will say to say they don’t want responsiblility to another person, and just doesn’t have to communicate with a potential partner.

Honestly, it’s just another way to say their having a mid-life crisis and have decided they don’t like responsibility.

7 thoughts on “Spanking Your Wife? Without their consent? And MGTOW? – Rant

  1. • My biggest question about this statement is: what do you mean ‘living according to his own best interest’ ?

    You could have used the contact form and simply asked us instead of speculating all kinds of nonsense. Living according to his own best interests means LIVING ACCORDING TO HIS OWN BEST INTERESTS. How is that not clear to you??

    • Really?

    Yes, really. Try and wrap your head around that. It’s OK, we’ll wait.

    • It’s just amazing what people will say to say they don’t want responsiblility to another person.

    It’s actually just “amazing” that you think MGTOW should make someone else their “responsibility”…. which would be living according to YOUR best interests. And MGTOW want no part of that.

    Are you getting it yet???

    You’re responsible for YOURSELF.
    MGTOW get it, why don’t YOU?

    Jesus Christ.

    Like

    • jayce428 says:

      And yet you failed to address the marriage aspect. Was it necessary to address us gays? It be immature and say “marriage is for gay so”, which is what I would only expect form teenagers and 20-something year olds. Oh what, does that describe you?

      I get living by your best interest but it doesn’t mean bordering off a whole half of society. I just believe that you’re going about this all wrong.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. We failed nothing. YOU failed to understand the basics and we pointed it out to you. You don’t even know what “living according to his own best interests” means.

    The statement “marriage is for gays” is not a negative statement at all. It’s not ANTI-anythijg. It’s not even anti-marriage. It means… MARRIAGE IS FOR GAYS. And since gays everywhere are fighting for the right to miserable, they should have it! It’s a positive statement! GO GAY MARRIAGE!!! WOOHOO!!!!

    • “I get living by your best interest …..”

    Finally. It was a wonder you asked at all.

    • “but it doesn’t mean bordering off a whole half of society. I just believe that you’re going about this all wrong.”

    Take a number and get in line. You think you’re the only one who thinks its’ wrong? EVERYBODY things MGTOW are going about it wall wrong. But are we really?

    We know you want a slave. We know you want men to fix downed power lines, and shovel your snow away. We know you go to bed at night when 2 feet of snow falls and you think men are just supposed to appear at 5AM and clean your roads – just automatically. We know you take for granted your right to freedom paid for with countless male lives so that you can waste an afternoon at Starbucks…. and that you think a man should DROWN on a sinking ship to save women he doesn’t even know.

    We KNOW you think it’s wrong.
    And we are VERY happy to disappoint you.

    Like

    • jayce428 says:

      No I don’t it’d be nice but it’s not realistic to rely on someone else to take care of me. I do want someone there who loves me and they don’t have to anything accept love me. I know how to take out my own trash and do house work, but they should do some of the work if they choose to live with me.

      I have a cousin who cooks and burns the food, and expects his mother to clean the dishes and everything else he’s 22-years-old. He smells like shit and sounds exactly like you do: “I try my best to help around the house, but it’s boring and I’d rather go play my game and scream so everyone else in the house can hear me.”

      And I’m a guy. So don’t make me seem like one of you lot, who think it’s better to laze around while females to the work.

      Liked by 1 person

      • gunlord500 says:

        Not much for BDSM personally, and I don’t personally want to get married (I’m a guy), but I’m not going to rag on those who have different kinks or for whom marriage makes sense for them, personally. MGTOW involves too much of that for me to consider being part of that scene “in my best interests.” I think you’re spot on with this essay and your critiques of those kooks, brother–don’t let ’em get you down.

        Liked by 1 person

      • jayce428 says:

        Nah… I’m not really bothered by it but I’m surprised that no one stepped forward about men who think it’s their job to be the ‘Masters’ of women. It was the part that bothered me most. I kept coming across questions about punishing their wives for things they did ‘wrong’, or rather the anti-feminists who believe all women should be submissive.

        I think that the MGTOW is a currently harmless group which see themselves as glorified for their choice of not wanting to stick around women, and some of them think of themselves as the guys that the wife cheats on her husband with.

        Liked by 1 person

      • gunlord500 says:

        Thanks man. But in reference to this:

        I think that the MGTOW is a currently harmless group which see themselves as glorified for their choice of not wanting to stick around women

        That’s true to an extent, but a lot of those guys are annoying as all hell; it’d be easier to just ignore them if they weren’t so loud. On another site, for instance, there’s this one self-proclaimed MGTOW who says a famous cartoonist should die because he writes ‘strong’ female characters. And sometimes they go from just annoying to threatening; guys like Elliot Rodgers believe the same stuff I’ve seen MGTOW say. That’s really the only reason I pay attention to those loons–know your enemy. Best to keep an eye on them to have forewarning in case one of ’em tries to pull something serious.

        Like

Leave a comment